NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Descent Mk3 43mm vs Epix Pro (Gen 2) Sapphire Edition 47mm

Garmin Descent Mk3 43mm vs Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2) Sapphire Edition 47mm

What Descent Mk3 43mm does better (3) and where Epix Pro (Gen 2) Sapphire Edition 47mm wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Descent Mk3 43mm
Garmin · 2023Descent Mk3 43mm
6.8Score
3 advantages≈ $1,200
vs
Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2) Sapphire Edition 47mm
7.2Score
7 advantages≈ $1,000
Higher score
6.0Display5.7
3.4Battery life5.8
9.4Health tracking8.3
6.9Sports & outdoor8.2
6.5Smart features6.5
9.7Build & durability8.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Descent Mk3 43mmEpix Pro (Gen 2) Sapphire Edition 47mm
43 × 4314.247 × 4714.6
Descent Mk3 43mmEpix Pro (Gen 2) Sapphire Edition 47mmDifference
Height43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Width43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Thickness14.2 mm14.6 mm−0.4 mm
Weight54 g70 g−16 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Descent Mk3 43mm better than Epix Pro (Gen 2) Sapphire Edition 47mm?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Weight53.5 g vs 70 g+31%
  3. Thickness14.2 mm vs 14.6 mm+3%

Why is Epix Pro (Gen 2) Sapphire Edition 47mm better than Descent Mk3 43mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 16 days+60%
  2. GPS battery life28 h vs 42 h+50%
  3. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.3″+8%
  4. Battery saver mode12 days vs 21 days+75%
  5. Battery life with always-on display4 days vs 6 days+50%
  6. GPS battery life (dual-band)17 h vs 20 h+18%
  7. Resolution (width)390 px vs 416 px+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare