NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Descent Mk3 43mm vs Fenix 7 Pro Sapphire Solar Edition

Garmin Descent Mk3 43mm vs Garmin Fenix 7 Pro Sapphire Solar Edition

What Descent Mk3 43mm does better (6) and where Fenix 7 Pro Sapphire Solar Edition wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Descent Mk3 43mm
Garmin · 2023Descent Mk3 43mm
6.8Score
6 advantages≈ $1,200
Higher score
vs
Garmin Fenix 7 Pro Sapphire Solar Edition
6.6Score
5 advantages≈ $900
6.0Display3.8
3.4Battery life7.4
9.4Health tracking8.3
6.9Sports & outdoor8.2
6.5Smart features6.5
9.7Build & durability8.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Descent Mk3 43mmFenix 7 Pro Sapphire Solar Edition
43 × 4314.247 × 4714.5
Descent Mk3 43mmFenix 7 Pro Sapphire Solar EditionDifference
Height43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Width43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Thickness14.2 mm14.5 mm−0.3 mm
Weight54 g73 g−20 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Descent Mk3 43mm better than Fenix 7 Pro Sapphire Solar Edition?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Fenix 7 Pro Sapphire Solar Edition: No
  3. Weight53.5 g vs 73 g+36%
  4. Pixel density325 ppi vs 200 ppi+62%
  5. Resolution (width)390 px vs 260 px+50%
  6. Thickness14.2 mm vs 14.5 mm+2%

Why is Fenix 7 Pro Sapphire Solar Edition better than Descent Mk3 43mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 18 days+80%
  2. GPS battery life28 h vs 57 h2×
  3. Battery saver mode12 days vs 57 days4.8×
  4. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.3″+8%
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)17 h vs 23 h+35%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare