NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Descent Mk3 43mm vs Fenix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED

Garmin Descent Mk3 43mm vs Garmin Fenix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED

What Descent Mk3 43mm does better (4) and where Fenix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Descent Mk3 43mm
Garmin · 2023Descent Mk3 43mm
6.8Score
4 advantages≈ $1,200
vs
Garmin Fenix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED
7.8Score
7 advantages≈ $1,100
Higher score
6.0Display7.5
3.4Battery life6.5
9.4Health tracking8.3
6.9Sports & outdoor8.2
6.5Smart features9.3
9.7Build & durability7.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Descent Mk3 43mmFenix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED
43 × 4314.247 × 4716
Descent Mk3 43mmFenix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLEDDifference
Height43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Width43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Thickness14.2 mm16 mm−1.8 mm
Weight54 g77 g−24 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Descent Mk3 43mm better than Fenix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Rated dive depth200 m vs 40 m5×
  3. Weight53.5 g vs 77 g+44%
  4. Thickness14.2 mm vs 16 mm+13%

Why is Fenix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED better than Descent Mk3 43mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 15 days+50%
  2. GPS battery life28 h vs 44 h+57%
  3. Battery life with always-on display4 days vs 8 days2×
  4. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.4″+17%
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)17 h vs 30 h+76%
  6. Battery saver mode12 days vs 19 days+58%
  7. Resolution (width)390 px vs 454 px+16%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare