NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Descent Mk3i 43mm vs Descent Mk3i 51mm

Garmin Descent Mk3i 43mm vs Garmin Descent Mk3i 51mm

What Descent Mk3i 43mm does better (2) and where Descent Mk3i 51mm wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Descent Mk3i 43mm
Garmin · 2023Descent Mk3i 43mm
6.8Score
2 advantages≈ $1,400
vs
Garmin Descent Mk3i 51mm
Garmin · 2023Descent Mk3i 51mm
9.6Score
7 advantages≈ $1,600
Higher score
6.0Display7.5
3.4Battery life8.4
9.4Health tracking9.4
6.9Sports & outdoor7.0
6.5Smart features6.5
9.7Build & durability9.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Descent Mk3i 43mmDescent Mk3i 51mm
43 × 4314.351 × 5116.4
Descent Mk3i 43mmDescent Mk3i 51mmDifference
Height43 mm51 mm−8 mm
Width43 mm51 mm−8 mm
Thickness14.3 mm16.4 mm−2.1 mm
Weight49 g78 g−28 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Descent Mk3i 43mm better than Descent Mk3i 51mm?

  1. Weight49.3 g vs 77.8 g+58%
  2. Thickness14.3 mm vs 16.4 mm+15%

Why is Descent Mk3i 51mm better than Descent Mk3i 43mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 25 days2.5×
  2. GPS battery life28 h vs 76 h2.7×
  3. Battery life with always-on display4 days vs 10 days2.5×
  4. Battery saver mode12 days vs 31 days2.6×
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)17 h vs 48 h2.8×
  6. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.4″+17%
  7. Resolution (width)390 px vs 454 px+16%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare