NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Descent Mk3i 43mm vs Fenix 8 Pro 51mm MicroLED

Garmin Descent Mk3i 43mm vs Garmin Fenix 8 Pro 51mm MicroLED

What Descent Mk3i 43mm does better (4) and where Fenix 8 Pro 51mm MicroLED wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Descent Mk3i 43mm
Garmin · 2023Descent Mk3i 43mm
6.8Score
4 advantages≈ $1,400
vs
Garmin Fenix 8 Pro 51mm MicroLED
7.3Score
5 advantages≈ $1,600
Higher score
6.0Display9.8
3.4Battery life4.9
9.4Health tracking8.3
6.9Sports & outdoor8.2
6.5Smart features9.3
9.7Build & durability6.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Descent Mk3i 43mmFenix 8 Pro 51mm MicroLED
43 × 4314.351 × 5117.5
Descent Mk3i 43mmFenix 8 Pro 51mm MicroLEDDifference
Height43 mm51 mm−8 mm
Width43 mm51 mm−8 mm
Thickness14.3 mm17.5 mm−3.2 mm
Weight49 g93 g−44 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Descent Mk3i 43mm better than Fenix 8 Pro 51mm MicroLED?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Weight49.3 g vs 93 g+89%
  3. Rated dive depth200 m vs 40 m5×
  4. Thickness14.3 mm vs 17.5 mm+22%

Why is Fenix 8 Pro 51mm MicroLED better than Descent Mk3i 43mm?

  1. GPS battery life28 h vs 44 h+57%
  2. GPS battery life (dual-band)17 h vs 34 h2×
  3. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.4″+17%
  4. Battery saver mode12 days vs 14 days+17%
  5. Resolution (width)390 px vs 454 px+16%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare