NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Descent Mk3i 43mm vs Tactix 8 47mm AMOLED

Garmin Descent Mk3i 43mm vs Garmin Tactix 8 47mm AMOLED

What Descent Mk3i 43mm does better (3) and where Tactix 8 47mm AMOLED wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Descent Mk3i 43mm
Garmin · 2023Descent Mk3i 43mm
6.8Score
3 advantages≈ $1,400
vs
Garmin Tactix 8 47mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2025Tactix 8 47mm AMOLED
7.7Score
7 advantages≈ $1,300
Higher score
6.0Display7.5
3.4Battery life6.5
9.4Health tracking8.3
6.9Sports & outdoor9.3
6.5Smart features3.2
9.7Build & durability7.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Descent Mk3i 43mmTactix 8 47mm AMOLED
43 × 4314.347 × 4713.8
Descent Mk3i 43mmTactix 8 47mm AMOLEDDifference
Height43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Width43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Thickness14.3 mm13.8 mm+0.5 mm
Weight49 g73 g−24 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Descent Mk3i 43mm better than Tactix 8 47mm AMOLED?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Weight49.3 g vs 73 g+48%
  3. Rated dive depth200 m vs 40 m5×

Why is Tactix 8 47mm AMOLED better than Descent Mk3i 43mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 16 days+60%
  2. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.4″+17%
  3. Battery saver mode12 days vs 23 days+92%
  4. Battery life with always-on display4 days vs 7 days+75%
  5. Resolution (width)390 px vs 454 px+16%
  6. Sport profiles98 vs 102+4%
  7. Thickness14.3 mm vs 13.8 mm+4%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare