NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Enduro 3 vs Fenix 8 Pro 51mm AMOLED

Garmin Enduro 3 vs Garmin Fenix 8 Pro 51mm AMOLED

What Enduro 3 does better (6) and where Fenix 8 Pro 51mm AMOLED wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Enduro 3
Garmin · 2024Enduro 3
8.4Score
6 advantages≈ $800
vs
Garmin Fenix 8 Pro 51mm AMOLED
8.8Score
4 advantages≈ $1,200
Higher score
4.4Display7.5
9.6Battery life8.6
8.3Health tracking8.3
7.0Sports & outdoor8.2
6.5Smart features9.3
9.2Build & durability6.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Enduro 3Fenix 8 Pro 51mm AMOLED
51 × 5115.751 × 5116.5
Enduro 3Fenix 8 Pro 51mm AMOLEDDifference
Height51 mm51 mm=
Width51 mm51 mm=
Thickness15.7 mm16.5 mm−0.8 mm
Weight63 g90 g−27 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Enduro 3 better than Fenix 8 Pro 51mm AMOLED?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)36 days vs 27 days+33%
  2. GPS battery life120 h vs 78 h+54%
  3. Battery saver mode92 days vs 34 days2.7×
  4. Weight63 g vs 90 g+43%
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)60 h vs 53 h+13%
  6. Thickness15.7 mm vs 16.5 mm+5%

Why is Fenix 8 Pro 51mm AMOLED better than Enduro 3?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Enduro 3: Yes
  2. Resolution (width)280 px vs 454 px+62%
  3. Pixel density200 ppi vs 324 ppi+62%
  4. Sport profiles97 vs 99+2%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare