NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Enduro 3 vs Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED

Garmin Enduro 3 vs Garmin Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED

What Enduro 3 does better (4) and where Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Enduro 3
Garmin · 2024Enduro 3
8.4Score
4 advantages≈ $800
vs
Garmin Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2025Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED
8.9Score
5 advantages≈ $1,200
Higher score
4.4Display7.5
9.6Battery life9.4
8.3Health tracking8.3
7.0Sports & outdoor8.2
6.5Smart features3.2
9.2Build & durability6.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Enduro 3Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED
51 × 5115.751 × 5114.7
Enduro 3Quatix 8 51mm AMOLEDDifference
Height51 mm51 mm=
Width51 mm51 mm=
Thickness15.7 mm14.7 mm+1 mm
Weight63 g92 g−29 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Enduro 3 better than Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)36 days vs 29 days+24%
  2. GPS battery life120 h vs 84 h+43%
  3. Weight63 g vs 92 g+46%
  4. Battery saver mode92 days vs 41 days2.2×

Why is Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED better than Enduro 3?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Enduro 3: Yes
  2. Resolution (width)280 px vs 454 px+62%
  3. Pixel density200 ppi vs 324 ppi+62%
  4. Thickness15.7 mm vs 14.7 mm+7%
  5. Sport profiles97 vs 99+2%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare