NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Enduro 3 vs Race 2

Garmin Enduro 3 vs Suunto Race 2

What Enduro 3 does better (5) and where Race 2 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Enduro 3
Garmin · 2024Enduro 3
8.4Score
5 advantages≈ $800
vs
Suunto Race 2
Suunto · 2025Race 2
9.0Score
5 advantages≈ $510
Higher score
4.4Display6.3
9.6Battery life8.0
8.3Health tracking4.9
7.0Sports & outdoor6.4
9.2Build & durability8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Enduro 3Race 2
51 × 5115.749 × 4912.5
Enduro 3Race 2Difference
Height51 mm49 mm+2 mm
Width51 mm49 mm+2 mm
Thickness15.7 mm12.5 mm+3.2 mm
Weight63 g76 g−13 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Enduro 3 better than Race 2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)36 days vs 18 days2×
  2. GPS battery life120 h vs 65 h+85%
  3. Weight63 g vs 76 g+21%
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)60 h vs 55 h+9%
  5. Sport profiles97 vs 95+2%

Why is Race 2 better than Enduro 3?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Enduro 3: Yes
  2. Screen size1.4″ vs 1.5″+7%
  3. Resolution (width)280 px vs 466 px+66%
  4. Pixel density200 ppi vs 311 ppi+55%
  5. Thickness15.7 mm vs 12.5 mm+26%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare