NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Fenix 8 47mm Solar vs Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED

Garmin Fenix 8 47mm Solar vs Garmin Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED

What Fenix 8 47mm Solar does better (3) and where Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Fenix 8 47mm Solar
Garmin · 2024Fenix 8 47mm Solar
6.8Score
3 advantages≈ $1,000
vs
Garmin Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2025Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED
8.0Score
6 advantages≈ $1,100
Higher score
3.8Display7.5
7.8Battery life6.8
8.3Health tracking8.3
8.2Sports & outdoor8.2
3.2Smart features3.2
7.1Build & durability7.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Fenix 8 47mm SolarQuatix 8 47mm AMOLED
47 × 4715.247 × 4713.8
Fenix 8 47mm SolarQuatix 8 47mm AMOLEDDifference
Height47 mm47 mm=
Width47 mm47 mm=
Thickness15.2 mm13.8 mm+1.4 mm
Weight80 g73 g+7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Fenix 8 47mm Solar better than Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)21 days vs 16 days+31%
  2. GPS battery life67 h vs 47 h+43%
  3. Battery saver mode34 days vs 23 days+48%

Why is Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED better than Fenix 8 47mm Solar?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Fenix 8 47mm Solar: Yes
  2. Weight80 g vs 73 g+10%
  3. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.4″+8%
  4. Resolution (width)260 px vs 454 px+75%
  5. Pixel density200 ppi vs 324 ppi+62%
  6. Thickness15.2 mm vs 13.8 mm+10%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare