NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Fenix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED vs Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED

Garmin Fenix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED vs Garmin Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED

What Fenix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED does better (1) and where Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Fenix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED
7.8Score
1 advantage≈ $1,100
vs
Garmin Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2025Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED
8.9Score
5 advantages≈ $1,200
Higher score
7.5Display7.5
6.5Battery life9.4
8.3Health tracking8.3
8.2Sports & outdoor8.2
9.3Smart features3.2
7.3Build & durability6.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Fenix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLEDQuatix 8 51mm AMOLED
47 × 471651 × 5114.7
Fenix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLEDQuatix 8 51mm AMOLEDDifference
Height47 mm51 mm−4 mm
Width47 mm51 mm−4 mm
Thickness16 mm14.7 mm+1.3 mm
Weight77 g92 g−15 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Fenix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED better than Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED?

  1. Weight77 g vs 92 g+19%

Why is Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED better than Fenix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)15 days vs 29 days+93%
  2. GPS battery life44 h vs 84 h+91%
  3. Battery saver mode19 days vs 41 days2.2×
  4. Battery life with always-on display8 days vs 13 days+62%
  5. Thickness16 mm vs 14.7 mm+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare