NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Fenix 9 43mm vs Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED

Garmin Fenix 9 43mm vs Garmin Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED

What Fenix 9 43mm does better (3) and where Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Fenix 9 43mm
Garmin · 2026Fenix 9 43mm
5.6Score
3 advantages≈ $1,000
vs
Garmin Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED
7.8Score
6 advantages≈ $1,200
Higher score
5.7Display7.5
2.5Battery life6.5
8.3Health tracking8.3
8.2Sports & outdoor8.2
3.2Smart features9.3
8.4Build & durability7.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Fenix 9 43mmQuatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED
43 × 4313.847 × 4716
Fenix 9 43mmQuatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLEDDifference
Height43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Width43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Thickness13.8 mm16 mm−2.2 mm
Weight61 g77 g−16 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Fenix 9 43mm better than Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED?

  1. Weight61 g vs 77 g+26%
  2. Storage64 GB vs 32 GB2×
  3. Thickness13.8 mm vs 16 mm+16%

Why is Quatix 8 Pro 47mm AMOLED better than Fenix 9 43mm?

  1. GPS battery life18 h vs 44 h2.4×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 15 days+50%
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)15 h vs 30 h2×
  4. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.4″+8%
  5. Battery saver mode15 days vs 19 days+27%
  6. Resolution (width)416 px vs 454 px+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare