NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 170 vs Forerunner 570 42mm

Garmin Forerunner 170 vs Garmin Forerunner 570 42mm

What Forerunner 170 does better (3) and where Forerunner 570 42mm wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 170
Garmin · 2026Forerunner 170
4.3Score
3 advantages≈ $300
vs
Garmin Forerunner 570 42mm
Garmin · 2025Forerunner 570 42mm
4.5Score
2 advantages≈ $550
Higher score
5.3Display5.3
2.9Battery life2.6
4.9Health tracking9.4
4.7Sports & outdoor5.5
3.1Build & durability3.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 170Forerunner 570 42mm
42.6 × 42.611.942.4 × 42.412.9
Forerunner 170Forerunner 570 42mmDifference
Height42.6 mm42.4 mm+0.2 mm
Width42.6 mm42.4 mm+0.2 mm
Thickness11.9 mm12.9 mm−1 mm
Weight41 g42 g−1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 170 better than Forerunner 570 42mm?

  1. GPS battery life20 h vs 18 h+11%
  2. Weight41 g vs 42 g+2%
  3. Thickness11.9 mm vs 12.9 mm+8%

Why is Forerunner 570 42mm better than Forerunner 170?

  1. Storage4 GB vs 8 GB2×
  2. Sport profiles78 vs 83+6%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare