NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 255 Music vs Vantage M3

Garmin Forerunner 255 Music vs Polar Vantage M3

What Forerunner 255 Music does better (3) and where Vantage M3 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 255 Music
Garmin · 2022Forerunner 255 Music
4.3Score
3 advantages≈ $400
vs
Polar Vantage M3
Polar · 2024Vantage M3
4.5Score
5 advantages≈ $430
Higher score
3.5Display6.4
4.8Battery life3.0
4.9Health tracking8.3
5.0Sports & outdoor2.9
2.7Build & durability4.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 255 MusicVantage M3
45.6 × 45.612.944.7 × 44.712.2
Forerunner 255 MusicVantage M3Difference
Height45.6 mm44.7 mm+0.9 mm
Width45.6 mm44.7 mm+0.9 mm
Thickness12.9 mm12.2 mm+0.7 mm
Weight49 g53 g−4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 255 Music better than Vantage M3?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 8 days+75%
  2. GPS battery life30 h vs 27 h+11%
  3. Weight49 g vs 53 g+8%

Why is Vantage M3 better than Forerunner 255 Music?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Forerunner 255 Music: Yes
  2. Storage4 GB vs 32 GB8×
  3. Pixel density200 ppi vs 325 ppi+62%
  4. Resolution (width)260 px vs 416 px+60%
  5. Thickness12.9 mm vs 12.2 mm+6%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare