NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 255 vs Pacer Pro

Garmin Forerunner 255 vs Polar Pacer Pro

What Forerunner 255 does better (3) and where Pacer Pro wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 255
Garmin · 2022Forerunner 255
4.2Score
3 advantages≈ $350
Higher score
vs
Polar Pacer Pro
Polar · 2022Pacer Pro
3.7Score
2 advantages≈ $380
3.5Display2.3
4.8Battery life3.2
4.9Health tracking2.1
5.0Sports & outdoor2.2
2.7Build & durability4.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 255Pacer Pro
45.6 × 45.612.945 × 4511.5
Forerunner 255Pacer ProDifference
Height45.6 mm45 mm+0.6 mm
Width45.6 mm45 mm+0.6 mm
Thickness12.9 mm11.5 mm+1.4 mm
Weight49 g41 g+8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 255 better than Pacer Pro?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 6.5 days2.2×
  2. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.2″+8%
  3. Resolution (width)260 px vs 240 px+8%

Why is Pacer Pro better than Forerunner 255?

  1. Weight49 g vs 41 g+20%
  2. Thickness12.9 mm vs 11.5 mm+12%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare