NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 255S vs Pacer

Garmin Forerunner 255S vs Polar Pacer

What Forerunner 255S does better (4) and where Pacer wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 255S
Garmin · 2022Forerunner 255S
3.9Score
4 advantages≈ $350
Higher score
vs
Polar Pacer
Polar · 2022Pacer
3.7Score
4 advantages≈ $260
2.2Display2.3
3.7Battery life3.5
4.9Health tracking2.1
5.0Sports & outdoor2.0
3.5Build & durability4.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 255SPacer
41 × 4112.445 × 4511.5
Forerunner 255SPacerDifference
Height41 mm45 mm−4 mm
Width41 mm45 mm−4 mm
Thickness12.4 mm11.5 mm+0.9 mm
Weight39 g40 g−1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 255S better than Pacer?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)12 days vs 6.5 days+85%
  2. Barometric altimeterYes · Pacer: No
  3. CompassYes · Pacer: No
  4. Weight39 g vs 40 g+3%

Why is Pacer better than Forerunner 255S?

  1. GPS battery life26 h vs 32 h+23%
  2. Screen size1.1″ vs 1.2″+9%
  3. Resolution (width)218 px vs 240 px+10%
  4. Thickness12.4 mm vs 11.5 mm+8%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare