NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 265S vs Vertical

Garmin Forerunner 265S vs Suunto Vertical

What Forerunner 265S does better (5) and where Vertical wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 265S
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 265S
5.2Score
5 advantages≈ $450
vs
Suunto Vertical
Suunto · 2023Vertical
8.3Score
8 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
5.0Display4.4
3.9Battery life9.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
5.0Sports & outdoor6.4
3.5Build & durability7.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 265SVertical
41.7 × 41.712.949 × 4913.6
Forerunner 265SVerticalDifference
Height41.7 mm49 mm−7.3 mm
Width41.7 mm49 mm−7.3 mm
Thickness12.9 mm13.6 mm−0.7 mm
Weight39 g86 g−47 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 265S better than Vertical?

  1. Weight39 g vs 86 g2.2×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Vertical: No
  3. Pixel density327 ppi vs 200 ppi+64%
  4. Resolution (width)360 px vs 280 px+29%
  5. Thickness12.9 mm vs 13.6 mm+5%

Why is Vertical better than Forerunner 265S?

  1. GPS battery life24 h vs 90 h3.8×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)15 days vs 20.8 days+39%
  3. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)15 h vs 65 h4.3×
  5. Storage8 GB vs 32 GB4×
  6. Screen size1.1″ vs 1.4″+27%
  7. Sapphire crystalNo · Forerunner 265S: Yes
  8. Sport profiles58 vs 95+64%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare