NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 70 vs Run 2

Garmin Forerunner 70 vs Suunto Run 2

What Forerunner 70 does better (3) and where Run 2 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 70
Garmin · 2026Forerunner 70
4.6Score
3 advantages≈ $250
vs
Suunto Run 2
Suunto · 2026Run 2
5.4Score
4 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
5.3Display7.1
3.9Battery life4.6
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.4Build & durability4.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 70Run 2
42.6 × 42.611.946.5 × 46.511.7
Forerunner 70Run 2Difference
Height42.6 mm46.5 mm−3.9 mm
Width42.6 mm46.5 mm−3.9 mm
Thickness11.9 mm11.7 mm+0.2 mm
Weight40 g53 g−13 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 70 better than Run 2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)13 days vs 12 days+8%
  2. Sport profiles76 vs 322.4×
  3. Weight40 g vs 53 g+32%

Why is Run 2 better than Forerunner 70?

  1. GPS battery life23 h vs 30 h+30%
  2. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.32″+10%
  3. Resolution (width)390 px vs 466 px+19%
  4. Pixel density325 ppi vs 353 ppi+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare