NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 965 vs Vertical 2

Garmin Forerunner 965 vs Suunto Vertical 2

What Forerunner 965 does better (4) and where Vertical 2 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 965
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 965
6.0Score
4 advantages≈ $600
vs
Suunto Vertical 2
Suunto · 2025Vertical 2
9.3Score
7 advantages≈ $640
Higher score
6.5Display6.3
6.8Battery life8.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
6.0Sports & outdoor6.4
2.4Build & durability7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 965Vertical 2
47.2 × 47.213.249 × 4913.6
Forerunner 965Vertical 2Difference
Height47.2 mm49 mm−1.8 mm
Width47.2 mm49 mm−1.8 mm
Thickness13.2 mm13.6 mm−0.4 mm
Weight53 g87 g−34 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 965 better than Vertical 2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)23 days vs 20 days+15%
  2. Weight53 g vs 87 g+64%
  3. Pixel density324 ppi vs 311 ppi+4%
  4. Thickness13.2 mm vs 13.6 mm+3%

Why is Vertical 2 better than Forerunner 965?

  1. GPS battery life31 h vs 75 h2.4×
  2. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)19 h vs 65 h3.4×
  4. Sapphire crystalNo · Forerunner 965: Yes
  5. Screen size1.4″ vs 1.5″+7%
  6. Sport profiles80 vs 95+19%
  7. Resolution (width)454 px vs 466 px+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare