NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 970 vs Ocean

Garmin Forerunner 970 vs Suunto Ocean

What Forerunner 970 does better (2) and where Ocean wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 970
Garmin · 2025Forerunner 970
5.9Score
2 advantages≈ $750
vs
Suunto Ocean
Suunto · 2024Ocean
9.2Score
6 advantages≈ $750
Higher score
6.5Display8.4
4.7Battery life7.8
8.3Health tracking4.9
6.6Sports & outdoor6.4
4.8Build & durability8.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 970Ocean
47 × 4712.949.9 × 49.913.3
Forerunner 970OceanDifference
Height47 mm49.9 mm−2.9 mm
Width47 mm49.9 mm−2.9 mm
Thickness12.9 mm13.3 mm−0.4 mm
Weight56 g99 g−43 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 970 better than Ocean?

  1. Weight56 g vs 99 g+77%
  2. Thickness12.9 mm vs 13.3 mm+3%

Why is Ocean better than Forerunner 970?

  1. GPS battery life26 h vs 65 h2.5×
  2. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  3. Battery life (smartwatch mode)15 days vs 16 days+7%
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)21 h vs 50 h2.4×
  5. Screen size1.4″ vs 1.43″+2%
  6. Resolution (width)454 px vs 466 px+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare