NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 970 vs Race 2

Garmin Forerunner 970 vs Suunto Race 2

What Forerunner 970 does better (2) and where Race 2 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 970
Garmin · 2025Forerunner 970
5.9Score
2 advantages≈ $750
vs
Suunto Race 2
Suunto · 2025Race 2
9.0Score
7 advantages≈ $510
Higher score
6.5Display6.3
4.7Battery life8.0
8.3Health tracking4.9
6.6Sports & outdoor6.4
4.8Build & durability8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 970Race 2
47 × 4712.949 × 4912.5
Forerunner 970Race 2Difference
Height47 mm49 mm−2 mm
Width47 mm49 mm−2 mm
Thickness12.9 mm12.5 mm+0.4 mm
Weight56 g76 g−20 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 970 better than Race 2?

  1. Weight56 g vs 76 g+36%
  2. Pixel density324 ppi vs 311 ppi+4%

Why is Race 2 better than Forerunner 970?

  1. GPS battery life26 h vs 65 h2.5×
  2. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  3. Battery life (smartwatch mode)15 days vs 18 days+20%
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)21 h vs 55 h2.6×
  5. Screen size1.4″ vs 1.5″+7%
  6. Thickness12.9 mm vs 12.5 mm+3%
  7. Resolution (width)454 px vs 466 px+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare