NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 970 vs Vertical 2

Garmin Forerunner 970 vs Suunto Vertical 2

What Forerunner 970 does better (3) and where Vertical 2 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 970
Garmin · 2025Forerunner 970
5.9Score
3 advantages≈ $750
vs
Suunto Vertical 2
Suunto · 2025Vertical 2
9.3Score
6 advantages≈ $640
Higher score
6.5Display6.3
4.7Battery life8.5
8.3Health tracking4.9
6.6Sports & outdoor6.4
4.8Build & durability7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 970Vertical 2
47 × 4712.949 × 4913.6
Forerunner 970Vertical 2Difference
Height47 mm49 mm−2 mm
Width47 mm49 mm−2 mm
Thickness12.9 mm13.6 mm−0.7 mm
Weight56 g87 g−31 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 970 better than Vertical 2?

  1. Weight56 g vs 87 g+55%
  2. Thickness12.9 mm vs 13.6 mm+5%
  3. Pixel density324 ppi vs 311 ppi+4%

Why is Vertical 2 better than Forerunner 970?

  1. GPS battery life26 h vs 75 h2.9×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)15 days vs 20 days+33%
  3. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)21 h vs 65 h3.1×
  5. Screen size1.4″ vs 1.5″+7%
  6. Resolution (width)454 px vs 466 px+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare