NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED vs Instinct 3 50mm Solar

Garmin Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED vs Garmin Instinct 3 50mm Solar

What Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED does better (6) and where Instinct 3 50mm Solar wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED
6.7Score
6 advantages≈ $350
vs
Garmin Instinct 3 50mm Solar
Garmin · 2025Instinct 3 50mm Solar
6.9Score
6 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
5.9Display4.0
5.6Battery life8.8
4.9Health tracking4.9
6.6Sports & outdoor6.2
5.6Build & durability5.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Instinct 3 45mm AMOLEDInstinct 3 50mm Solar
45 × 4514.950 × 5014.4
Instinct 3 45mm AMOLEDInstinct 3 50mm SolarDifference
Height45 mm50 mm−5 mm
Width45 mm50 mm−5 mm
Thickness14.9 mm14.4 mm+0.5 mm
Weight53 g58 g−5 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED better than Instinct 3 50mm Solar?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Instinct 3 50mm Solar: No
  2. Pixel density325 ppi vs 113 ppi2.9×
  3. Storage4 GB vs 0.12 GB33.3×
  4. Resolution (width)390 px vs 176 px2.2×
  5. Weight53 g vs 58 g+9%
  6. Sport profiles96 vs 94+2%

Why is Instinct 3 50mm Solar better than Instinct 3 45mm AMOLED?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)18 days vs 40 days2.2×
  2. GPS battery life32 h vs 60 h+88%
  3. Battery saver mode24 days vs 100 days4.2×
  4. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.56″+30%
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)23 h vs 34 h+48%
  6. Thickness14.9 mm vs 14.4 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare