NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED vs Instinct Crossover

Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED vs Garmin Instinct Crossover

What Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED does better (8) and where Instinct Crossover wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED
7.5Score
8 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Garmin Instinct Crossover
Garmin · 2022Instinct Crossover
6.5Score
3 advantages≈ $400
5.6Display2.6
7.3Battery life9.6
4.9Health tracking4.9
6.6Sports & outdoor5.3
5.4Build & durability5.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Instinct 3 50mm AMOLEDInstinct Crossover
50 × 5014.445 × 4516.2
Instinct 3 50mm AMOLEDInstinct CrossoverDifference
Height50 mm45 mm+5 mm
Width50 mm45 mm+5 mm
Thickness14.4 mm16.2 mm−1.8 mm
Weight59 g65 g−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED better than Instinct Crossover?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Instinct Crossover: No
  2. Storage4 GB vs 0.06 GB66.7×
  3. Resolution (width)416 px vs 176 px2.4×
  4. Pixel density320 ppi vs 139 ppi2.3×
  5. Weight59 g vs 65 g+10%
  6. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.27″+2%
  7. Sport profiles96 vs 84+14%
  8. Thickness14.4 mm vs 16.2 mm+12%

Why is Instinct Crossover better than Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED?

  1. GPS battery life40 h vs 111 h2.8×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)24 days vs 28 days+17%
  3. Battery saver mode30 days vs 71 days2.4×
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare