NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED vs Race 2

Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED vs Suunto Race 2

What Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED does better (3) and where Race 2 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED
7.5Score
3 advantages≈ $400
vs
Suunto Race 2
Suunto · 2025Race 2
9.0Score
7 advantages≈ $510
Higher score
5.6Display6.3
7.3Battery life8.0
4.9Health tracking4.9
6.6Sports & outdoor6.4
5.4Build & durability8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Instinct 3 50mm AMOLEDRace 2
50 × 5014.449 × 4912.5
Instinct 3 50mm AMOLEDRace 2Difference
Height50 mm49 mm+1 mm
Width50 mm49 mm+1 mm
Thickness14.4 mm12.5 mm+1.9 mm
Weight59 g76 g−17 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED better than Race 2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)24 days vs 18 days+33%
  2. Weight59 g vs 76 g+29%
  3. Pixel density320 ppi vs 311 ppi+3%

Why is Race 2 better than Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED?

  1. GPS battery life40 h vs 65 h+62%
  2. Storage4 GB vs 32 GB8×
  3. Sapphire crystalNo · Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED: Yes
  4. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.5″+15%
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)30 h vs 55 h+83%
  6. Thickness14.4 mm vs 12.5 mm+15%
  7. Resolution (width)416 px vs 466 px+12%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare