NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED vs Race S

Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED vs Suunto Race S

What Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED does better (2) and where Race S wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED
7.5Score
2 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Suunto Race S
Suunto · 2024Race S
6.1Score
6 advantages≈ $300
5.6Display4.8
7.3Battery life4.6
4.9Health tracking4.9
6.6Sports & outdoor6.4
5.4Build & durability9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Instinct 3 50mm AMOLEDRace S
50 × 5014.445 × 4511.4
Instinct 3 50mm AMOLEDRace SDifference
Height50 mm45 mm+5 mm
Width50 mm45 mm+5 mm
Thickness14.4 mm11.4 mm+3 mm
Weight59 g53 g+6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED better than Race S?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)24 days vs 9 days2.7×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Race S: No

Why is Race S better than Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED?

  1. Storage4 GB vs 32 GB8×
  2. Sapphire crystalNo · Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED: Yes
  3. Weight59 g vs 53 g+11%
  4. Thickness14.4 mm vs 11.4 mm+26%
  5. Resolution (width)416 px vs 466 px+12%
  6. Pixel density320 ppi vs 353 ppi+10%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare