NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED vs Vertical

Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED vs Suunto Vertical

What Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED does better (5) and where Vertical wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED
7.5Score
5 advantages≈ $400
vs
Suunto Vertical
Suunto · 2023Vertical
8.3Score
6 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
5.6Display4.4
7.3Battery life9.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
6.6Sports & outdoor6.4
5.4Build & durability7.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Instinct 3 50mm AMOLEDVertical
50 × 5014.449 × 4913.6
Instinct 3 50mm AMOLEDVerticalDifference
Height50 mm49 mm+1 mm
Width50 mm49 mm+1 mm
Thickness14.4 mm13.6 mm+0.8 mm
Weight59 g86 g−27 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED better than Vertical?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Vertical: No
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)24 days vs 20.8 days+15%
  3. Weight59 g vs 86 g+46%
  4. Pixel density320 ppi vs 200 ppi+60%
  5. Resolution (width)416 px vs 280 px+49%

Why is Vertical better than Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED?

  1. GPS battery life40 h vs 90 h2.2×
  2. Storage4 GB vs 32 GB8×
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)30 h vs 65 h2.2×
  4. Sapphire crystalNo · Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED: Yes
  5. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.4″+8%
  6. Thickness14.4 mm vs 13.6 mm+6%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare