NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Instinct Crossover AMOLED vs Vertical 2

Garmin Instinct Crossover AMOLED vs Suunto Vertical 2

What Instinct Crossover AMOLED does better (3) and where Vertical 2 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Instinct Crossover AMOLED
6.4Score
3 advantages≈ $650
vs
Suunto Vertical 2
Suunto · 2025Vertical 2
9.3Score
7 advantages≈ $640
Higher score
5.9Display6.3
4.0Battery life8.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
6.8Sports & outdoor6.4
9.1Build & durability7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Instinct Crossover AMOLEDVertical 2
46.6 × 46.615.149 × 4913.6
Instinct Crossover AMOLEDVertical 2Difference
Height46.6 mm49 mm−2.4 mm
Width46.6 mm49 mm−2.4 mm
Thickness15.1 mm13.6 mm+1.5 mm
Weight67 g87 g−20 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Instinct Crossover AMOLED better than Vertical 2?

  1. Weight67 g vs 87 g+30%
  2. Pixel density325 ppi vs 311 ppi+5%
  3. Sport profiles97 vs 95+2%

Why is Vertical 2 better than Instinct Crossover AMOLED?

  1. GPS battery life29 h vs 75 h2.6×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 20 days+43%
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)15 h vs 65 h4.3×
  4. Storage4 GB vs 32 GB8×
  5. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.5″+25%
  6. Resolution (width)390 px vs 466 px+19%
  7. Thickness15.1 mm vs 13.6 mm+11%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare