NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Instinct Crossover vs Race

Garmin Instinct Crossover vs Suunto Race

What Instinct Crossover does better (3) and where Race wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Instinct Crossover
Garmin · 2022Instinct Crossover
6.5Score
3 advantages≈ $400
vs
Suunto Race
Suunto · 2023Race
8.6Score
7 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
2.6Display4.8
9.6Battery life8.6
4.9Health tracking4.9
5.3Sports & outdoor6.4
5.3Build & durability8.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Instinct CrossoverRace
45 × 4516.249 × 4913.3
Instinct CrossoverRaceDifference
Height45 mm49 mm−4 mm
Width45 mm49 mm−4 mm
Thickness16.2 mm13.3 mm+2.9 mm
Weight65 g83 g−18 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Instinct Crossover better than Race?

  1. GPS battery life111 h vs 65 h+71%
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)28 days vs 20.8 days+35%
  3. Weight65 g vs 83 g+28%

Why is Race better than Instinct Crossover?

  1. Resolution (width)176 px vs 466 px2.6×
  2. Storage0.06 GB vs 32 GB533.3×
  3. Pixel density139 ppi vs 326 ppi2.3×
  4. Sapphire crystalNo · Instinct Crossover: Yes
  5. Screen size1.27″ vs 1.43″+13%
  6. Thickness16.2 mm vs 13.3 mm+22%
  7. Sport profiles84 vs 95+13%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare