NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. MARQ Golfer (Gen 3) vs FW66 Iron R

Garmin MARQ Golfer (Gen 3) vs Maxcom FW66 Iron R

What MARQ Golfer (Gen 3) does better (2) and where FW66 Iron R wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Garmin MARQ Golfer (Gen 3)
Garmin · 2026MARQ Golfer (Gen 3)
7.4Score
2 advantages≈ $2,800
vs
Maxcom FW66 Iron R
Maxcom · 2025FW66 Iron R
9.1Score
4 advantages≈ $120
Higher score
7.5Display9.1
8.3Health tracking4.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

MARQ Golfer (Gen 3)FW66 Iron R
47 × 471545 × 5111
MARQ Golfer (Gen 3)FW66 Iron RDifference
Height47 mm51 mm−4 mm
Width47 mm45 mm+2 mm
Thickness15 mm11 mm+4 mm
Weight86 g56 g+30 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MARQ Golfer (Gen 3) better than FW66 Iron R?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)18 days vs 14 days+29%
  2. LTE (cellular)Yes · FW66 Iron R: No

Why is FW66 Iron R better than MARQ Golfer (Gen 3)?

  1. Weight86 g vs 56 g+54%
  2. Screen size1.4″ vs 1.43″+2%
  3. Thickness15 mm vs 11 mm+36%
  4. Resolution (width)454 px vs 466 px+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare