NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED vs Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED

Garmin Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED vs Garmin Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED

What Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED does better (2) and where Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2025Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED
8.0Score
2 advantages≈ $1,100
vs
Garmin Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2025Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED
8.9Score
4 advantages≈ $1,200
Higher score
7.5Display7.5
6.8Battery life9.4
8.3Health tracking8.3
8.2Sports & outdoor8.2
3.2Smart features3.2
7.7Build & durability6.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Quatix 8 47mm AMOLEDQuatix 8 51mm AMOLED
47 × 4713.851 × 5114.7
Quatix 8 47mm AMOLEDQuatix 8 51mm AMOLEDDifference
Height47 mm51 mm−4 mm
Width47 mm51 mm−4 mm
Thickness13.8 mm14.7 mm−0.9 mm
Weight73 g92 g−19 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED better than Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED?

  1. Weight73 g vs 92 g+26%
  2. Thickness13.8 mm vs 14.7 mm+7%

Why is Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED better than Quatix 8 47mm AMOLED?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)16 days vs 29 days+81%
  2. GPS battery life47 h vs 84 h+79%
  3. Battery life with always-on display7 days vs 13 days+86%
  4. Battery saver mode23 days vs 41 days+78%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare