NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED vs Tactix 8 51mm AMOLED Cerakote Coating

Garmin Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED vs Garmin Tactix 8 51mm AMOLED Cerakote Coating

What Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED does better (1) and where Tactix 8 51mm AMOLED Cerakote Coating wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2025Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED
8.9Score
1 advantage≈ $1,200
vs
Garmin Tactix 8 51mm AMOLED Cerakote Coating
9.2Score
1 advantage≈ $1,600
Higher score
7.5Display7.5
9.4Battery life9.4
8.3Health tracking9.4
8.2Sports & outdoor9.3
3.2Smart features3.2
6.4Build & durability6.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Quatix 8 51mm AMOLEDTactix 8 51mm AMOLED Cerakote Coating
51 × 5114.751 × 5114.7
Quatix 8 51mm AMOLEDTactix 8 51mm AMOLED Cerakote CoatingDifference
Height51 mm51 mm=
Width51 mm51 mm=
Thickness14.7 mm14.7 mm=
Weight92 g94 g−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED better than Tactix 8 51mm AMOLED Cerakote Coating?

  1. Weight92 g vs 94 g+2%

Why is Tactix 8 51mm AMOLED Cerakote Coating better than Quatix 8 51mm AMOLED?

  1. Sport profiles99 vs 102+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare