NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Venu 2 vs Vivoactive 4

Garmin Venu 2 vs Garmin Vivoactive 4

What Venu 2 does better (7) and where Vivoactive 4 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Venu 2
Garmin · 2021Venu 2
6.2Score
7 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Garmin Vivoactive 4
Garmin · 2019Vivoactive 4
6.0Score
0 advantages≈ $350
6.7Battery life5.3
5.0Health tracking5.0
2.6Sports & outdoor2.4
7.3Smart features7.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Venu 2Vivoactive 4
45.4 × 45.412.245.1 × 45.112.8
Venu 2Vivoactive 4Difference
Height45.4 mm45.1 mm+0.3 mm
Width45.4 mm45.1 mm+0.3 mm
Thickness12.2 mm12.8 mm−0.6 mm
Weight49 g50 g−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Venu 2 better than Vivoactive 4?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)11 days vs 8 days+38%
  2. GPS battery life22 h vs 18 h+22%
  3. Weight49 g vs 50.5 g+3%
  4. Resolution (width)416 px vs 260 px+60%
  5. Pixel density320 ppi vs 200 ppi+60%
  6. Sport profiles30 vs 19+58%
  7. Thickness12.2 mm vs 12.8 mm+5%

Why is Vivoactive 4 better than Venu 2?

Vivoactive 4 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare