NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Venu 2S vs Vivoactive 4S

Garmin Venu 2S vs Garmin Vivoactive 4S

What Venu 2S does better (7) and where Vivoactive 4S wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Venu 2S
Garmin · 2021Venu 2S
5.9Score
7 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Garmin Vivoactive 4S
Garmin · 2019Vivoactive 4S
5.6Score
0 advantages≈ $350
5.6Battery life4.3
5.0Health tracking5.0
2.6Sports & outdoor2.4
7.3Smart features7.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Venu 2SVivoactive 4S
40.4 × 40.412.140 × 4012.7
Venu 2SVivoactive 4SDifference
Height40.4 mm40 mm+0.4 mm
Width40.4 mm40 mm+0.4 mm
Thickness12.1 mm12.7 mm−0.6 mm
Weight38 g40 g−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Venu 2S better than Vivoactive 4S?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 7 days+43%
  2. GPS battery life19 h vs 15 h+27%
  3. Weight38.2 g vs 40 g+5%
  4. Pixel density327 ppi vs 198 ppi+65%
  5. Resolution (width)360 px vs 218 px+65%
  6. Sport profiles30 vs 19+58%
  7. Thickness12.1 mm vs 12.7 mm+5%

Why is Vivoactive 4S better than Venu 2S?

Vivoactive 4S has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare