NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Vivoactive 5 vs Galaxy Watch6 Classic

Garmin Vivoactive 5 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch6 Classic

What Vivoactive 5 does better (1) and where Galaxy Watch6 Classic wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Vivoactive 5
Garmin · 2023Vivoactive 5
6.8Score
1 advantage≈ $270
vs
Samsung Galaxy Watch6 Classic
Samsung · 2023Galaxy Watch6 Classic
8.4Score
6 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
4.8Display9.1
5.0Health tracking8.6
6.0Sports & outdoor6.4
7.3Smart features7.9
3.6Build & durability4.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Vivoactive 5Galaxy Watch6 Classic
42.2 × 42.211.146.5 × 46.510.9
Vivoactive 5Galaxy Watch6 ClassicDifference
Height42.2 mm46.5 mm−4.3 mm
Width42.2 mm46.5 mm−4.3 mm
Thickness11.1 mm10.9 mm+0.2 mm
Weight23 g59 g−36 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Vivoactive 5 better than Galaxy Watch6 Classic?

  1. Weight23 g vs 59 g2.6×

Why is Galaxy Watch6 Classic better than Vivoactive 5?

  1. Storage4 GB vs 16 GB4×
  2. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.5″+25%
  3. Sapphire crystalNo · Vivoactive 5: Yes
  4. Wireless chargingNo · Vivoactive 5: Yes
  5. Pixel density325 ppi vs 453 ppi+39%
  6. Resolution (width)390 px vs 480 px+23%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare