NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Vivoactive 6 vs Galaxy Watch8 Classic

Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic

What Vivoactive 6 does better (1) and where Galaxy Watch8 Classic wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Vivoactive 6
Garmin · 2025Vivoactive 6
6.8Score
1 advantage≈ $300
vs
Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic
Samsung · 2025Galaxy Watch8 Classic
8.3Score
6 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
4.8Display9.1
5.0Health tracking8.2
9.3Sports & outdoor3.1
7.3Smart features7.9
3.6Build & durability4.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Vivoactive 6Galaxy Watch8 Classic
42.2 × 42.210.946 × 46.410.6
Vivoactive 6Galaxy Watch8 ClassicDifference
Height42.2 mm46.4 mm−4.2 mm
Width42.2 mm46 mm−3.8 mm
Thickness10.9 mm10.6 mm+0.3 mm
Weight23 g64 g−40 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Vivoactive 6 better than Galaxy Watch8 Classic?

  1. Weight23 g vs 63.5 g2.8×

Why is Galaxy Watch8 Classic better than Vivoactive 6?

  1. Storage8 GB vs 64 GB8×
  2. Sapphire crystalNo · Vivoactive 6: Yes
  3. Wireless chargingNo · Vivoactive 6: Yes
  4. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.34″+12%
  5. Resolution (width)390 px vs 438 px+12%
  6. Thickness10.9 mm vs 10.6 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare