vs
5.5Health tracking2.1
Why is Fit Track 3910 better than Loop?
Fit Track 3910 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Loop better than Fit Track 3910?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)6 days vs 8 days+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 27 mm |
| Weight | — | 29 g |
| Thickness | — | 9 mm |
| Height | — | 42 mm |
| Width | — | 27 mm |
| Case material | — | Stainless steel |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Water resistance | — | 3 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | WR30 |
| Colours | Black | Greige Sand, Brown Copper, Night Black, Black Cherry, Ice Cream |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.05″ | — |
| Display technology | LCD | — |
| Panel | LCD | None |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 6 days | 8 days |
| Battery capacity | — | 170 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Pol |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Skin temperature | — | No |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Offline maps | — | No |
| LED flashlight | — | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Polar OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | — | Android, iOS |
