vs
2.4Display6.1
5.5Health tracking5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Fit Watch 4910Band 10
| Fit Watch 4910 | Band 10 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 45 mm | 24.9 mm | +20.1 mm |
| Weight | 35 g | 15 g | +20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Fit Watch 4910 better than Band 10?
Fit Watch 4910 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Band 10 better than Fit Watch 4910?
- Weight35 g vs 15 g2.3×
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)6 days vs 8 days+33%
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Fit Watch 4910: Yes
- Screen size1.09″ vs 1.47″+35%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 45 mm | 43 mm |
| Weight | 35 g | 15 g |
| Thickness | — | 9 mm |
| Height | — | 43.4 mm |
| Width | — | 24.9 mm |
| Case material | Stainless steel | — |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | Fluorelastomer |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.09″ | 1.47″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | LCD | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Always-on display | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 194 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 368 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 6 days | 8 days |
| Battery capacity | — | 180 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Charging | — | kabellos, magnetische Ladeschale |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer, ambient light |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
