vs
6.6Display9.2
5.5Health tracking5.5
9.5Build & durability5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Band 8Watch Fit 3
| Band 8 | Watch Fit 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 24.5 mm | 36.3 mm | −11.8 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 9.9 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 14 g | 26 g | −12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Band 8 better than Watch Fit 3?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 10 days+40%
- Weight14 g vs 26 g+86%
- Thickness9 mm vs 9.9 mm+10%
Why is Watch Fit 3 better than Band 8?
- Screen size1.47″ vs 1.82″+24%
- Resolution (width)368 px vs 480 px+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 25 mm | — |
| Weight | 14 g | 26 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 9.9 mm |
| Height | — | 43.2 mm |
| Width | — | 36.3 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Aluminium |
| Lens / cover glass | 2.5D-Glas | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.47″ | 1.82″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 368 px | 480 px |
| Resolution (height) | 194 px | 408 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 14 days | 10 days |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate, accelerometer, ambient light |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | Android, iOS | iOS, Android |
