vs
6.1Display9.2
5.5Health tracking5.5
6.6Build & durability5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Band 9Watch Fit 3
| Band 9 | Watch Fit 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 43.4 mm | 43.2 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Width | 24.9 mm | 36.3 mm | −11.4 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 9.9 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 23 g | 26 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Band 9 better than Watch Fit 3?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 10 days+40%
- Weight23 g vs 26 g+13%
- Thickness9 mm vs 9.9 mm+10%
Why is Watch Fit 3 better than Band 9?
- Resolution (width)194 px vs 480 px2.5×
- Screen size1.47″ vs 1.82″+24%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 25 mm | — |
| Weight | 23 g | 26 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 9.9 mm |
| Height | 43.4 mm | 43.2 mm |
| Width | 24.9 mm | 36.3 mm |
| Case material | — | Aluminium |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 5 ATM |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.47″ | 1.82″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Always-on display | Yes | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 194 px | 480 px |
| Resolution (height) | 368 px | 408 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 14 days | 10 days |
| Battery capacity | 180 mAh | — |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Charging | kabellos, magnetische Ladeschale | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, accelerometer, ambient light | heart rate, accelerometer, ambient light |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
