Why is Pulse better than PSW 300?
- Screen size1.96″ vs 1.85″+6%
- Battery capacity350 mAh vs 240 mAh+46%
Why is PSW 300 better than Pulse?
PSW 300 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 41 mm |
| Thickness | — | 13 mm |
| Lens / cover glass | Gorilla Glas | — |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.96″ | 1.85″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 410 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 502 px | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 12 days |
| Battery capacity | 350 mAh | 240 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
