vs
9.1Display9.1
4.9Health tracking4.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Tank T3 Ultra 2FW66 Iron R
| Tank T3 Ultra 2 | FW66 Iron R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 48 mm | 45 mm | +3 mm |
| Weight | 71 g | 56 g | +15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Tank T3 Ultra 2 better than FW66 Iron R?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)15 days vs 14 days+7%
- Battery capacity470 mAh vs 300 mAh+57%
Why is FW66 Iron R better than Tank T3 Ultra 2?
- Weight71 g vs 56 g+27%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 48 mm | 45 mm |
| Weight | 71 g | 56 g |
| Thickness | — | 11 mm |
| Height | — | 51 mm |
| Width | — | 45 mm |
| Lens / cover glass | — | 2.5D-Glas Kristallglas |
| Strap material | — | Edelstahl, Silikon |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM | — |
| Military-grade (MIL-STD-810) | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | 466 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 15 days | 14 days |
| Battery capacity | 470 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Connectivity | ||
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Music on the watch | — | Yes |
| Storage | — | 128 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
| Chipset | — | RTL8763E |
