vs
4.6Display4.2
5.0Health tracking5.0
3.9Smart features3.9
Why is Prowatch ZN better than BT101?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · BT101: No
- Resolution (width)466 px vs 320 px+46%
- Pixel density326 ppi vs 250 ppi+30%
Why is BT101 better than Prowatch ZN?
- Screen size1.43″ vs 2.02″+41%
- Battery capacity350 mAh vs 410 mAh+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 58 mm |
| Thickness | — | 13.3 mm |
| Height | — | 58.3 mm |
| Width | — | 46.1 mm |
| Lens / cover glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Tempered glass |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Water resistance | — | 1 ATM |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM |
| Colours | Black, Tarnish | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 2.02″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | LCD |
| Panel | AMOLED | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | 320 px |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | 390 px |
| Pixel density | 326 ppi | 250 ppi |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 7 days |
| Battery capacity | 350 mAh | 410 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2, blood pressure, barometer, compass |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
