vs
2.0Build & durability4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
R8851112001Watch 2
| R8851112001 | Watch 2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 45 mm | 46.4 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 13.3 mm | 11 mm | +2.3 mm |
| Weight | 150 g | 47 g | +103 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is R8851112001 better than Watch 2?
R8851112001 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Watch 2 better than R8851112001?
- Weight150 g vs 47 g3.2×
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · R8851112001: Yes
- Water resistance3 ATM vs 5 ATM+67%
- Thickness13.3 mm vs 11 mm+21%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 45 mm | 46 mm |
| Weight | 150 g | 47 g |
| Thickness | 13.3 mm | 11 mm |
| Height | — | 46.4 mm |
| Width | — | 46.4 mm |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Lens / cover glass | Mineralglas | — |
| Strap material | Leder | — |
| Water resistance | 3 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 3 ATM | — |
| Colours | Black, Silver | Black, Brown, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | — | AMOLED |
| Panel | — | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 466 px |
| Pixel density | — | 326 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, barometer, compass, altimeter, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | — | Yes |
| eSIM | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Storage | — | 2 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
