NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. FW55 Aurum Pro vs CMF Watch Pro

Maxcom FW55 Aurum Pro vs Nothing CMF Watch Pro

What FW55 Aurum Pro does better (1) and where CMF Watch Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Maxcom FW55 Aurum Pro
Maxcom · 2023FW55 Aurum Pro
5.1Score
1 advantage≈ $45
vs
Nothing CMF Watch Pro
Nothing · 2023CMF Watch Pro
5.6Score
5 advantages≈ $45
Higher score
4.1Display7.1
5.0Health tracking5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

FW55 Aurum ProCMF Watch Pro
38 × 2551039.9 × 46.911.4
FW55 Aurum ProCMF Watch ProDifference
Height255 mm46.9 mm+208.1 mm
Width38 mm39.9 mm−1.9 mm
Thickness10 mm11.4 mm−1.4 mm
Weight46 g31 g+15 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is FW55 Aurum Pro better than CMF Watch Pro?

  1. Thickness10 mm vs 11.4 mm+14%

Why is CMF Watch Pro better than FW55 Aurum Pro?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · FW55 Aurum Pro: Yes
  2. Weight46 g vs 31.1 g+48%
  3. Screen size1.7″ vs 1.96″+15%
  4. Resolution (width)240 px vs 410 px+71%
  5. Battery capacity230 mAh vs 340 mAh+48%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare