vs
4.1Display3.6
5.0Health tracking5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
FW55 Aurum Pro2.0 SW022
| FW55 Aurum Pro | 2.0 SW022 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 38 mm | 45 mm | −7 mm |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 10.4 mm | −0.4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is FW55 Aurum Pro better than 2.0 SW022?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)6 days vs 5 days+20%
- Battery capacity230 mAh vs 200 mAh+15%
- Thickness10 mm vs 10.4 mm+4%
Why is 2.0 SW022 better than FW55 Aurum Pro?
2.0 SW022 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 45 mm |
| Weight | 46 g | — |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 10.4 mm |
| Height | 255 mm | — |
| Width | 38 mm | — |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Mineralglas |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.7″ | 1.7″ |
| Panel | IPS | — |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 280 px | 280 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 6 days | 5 days |
| Battery capacity | 230 mAh | 200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| LTE (cellular) | No | — |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.1 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | — | iOS |
