vs
5.6Display4.6
5.0Health tracking5.0
3.9Smart features3.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto Watch 120BT50
| Moto Watch 120 | BT50 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 50.6 mm | 51.2 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Width | 44.6 mm | 51.2 mm | −6.6 mm |
| Thickness | 11 mm | 13 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 55 g | 76 g | −21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto Watch 120 better than BT50?
- Built-in GPSYes · BT50: No
- Weight55 g vs 76 g+38%
- Thickness11 mm vs 13 mm+18%
Why is BT50 better than Moto Watch 120?
- Resolution (width)320 px vs 466 px+46%
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 400 mAh+33%
- Pixel density316 ppi vs 326 ppi+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 51 mm | 51 mm |
| Weight | 55 g | 76 g |
| Thickness | 11 mm | 13 mm |
| Height | 50.6 mm | 51.2 mm |
| Width | 44.6 mm | 51.2 mm |
| Water resistance | — | 1 ATM |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Colours | Glacier Silver, Phantom Black, Rose Gold | Silver, Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 320 px | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 466 px |
| Pixel density | 316 ppi | 326 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 400 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2 | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Moto Watch OS | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
