NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Moto Watch 40 vs CMF Watch Pro 2

Motorola Moto Watch 40 vs Nothing CMF Watch Pro 2

What Moto Watch 40 does better (3) and where CMF Watch Pro 2 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Moto Watch 40
Motorola · 2024Moto Watch 40
4.4Score
3 advantages≈ $65
vs
Nothing CMF Watch Pro 2
Nothing · 2024CMF Watch Pro 2
5.5Score
7 advantages≈ $65
Higher score
2.8Display5.2
5.0Health tracking5.0
2.5Smart features3.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Moto Watch 40CMF Watch Pro 2
30.8 × 45.910.245 × 4513.6
Moto Watch 40CMF Watch Pro 2Difference
Height45.9 mm45 mm+0.9 mm
Width30.8 mm45 mm−14.2 mm
Thickness10.2 mm13.6 mm−3.4 mm
Weight26 g44 g−18 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Moto Watch 40 better than CMF Watch Pro 2?

  1. Weight26 g vs 44.4 g+71%
  2. Screen size1.57″ vs 1.32″+19%
  3. Thickness10.2 mm vs 13.6 mm+33%

Why is CMF Watch Pro 2 better than Moto Watch 40?

  1. Built-in GPSNo · Moto Watch 40: Yes
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Moto Watch 40: Yes
  3. SpeakerNo · Moto Watch 40: Yes
  4. Resolution (width)240 px vs 466 px+94%
  5. Pixel density235 ppi vs 353 ppi+50%
  6. Battery capacity240 mAh vs 305 mAh+27%
  7. Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare