Dimensions
Size comparison
NC83ENC92E
| NC83E | NC92E | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 38 mm | 15 mm | +23 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is NC83E better than NC92E?
- Screen size1.69″ vs 1.47″+15%
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 170 px+41%
- Battery capacity700 mAh vs 500 mAh+40%
Why is NC92E better than NC83E?
NC92E has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 15 mm |
| Weight | 55 g | — |
| Thickness | 15 mm | — |
| Height | 48 mm | — |
| Width | 38 mm | — |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.69″ | 1.47″ |
| Panel | IPS | IPS |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 170 px |
| Resolution (height) | 280 px | 320 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 6 days | — |
| Battery capacity | 700 mAh | 500 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Sensors | — | accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| LTE (cellular) | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 1 | — |
