NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. CMF Watch Pro 2 vs iQOO Watch GT

Nothing CMF Watch Pro 2 vs Vivo iQOO Watch GT

What CMF Watch Pro 2 does better (2) and where iQOO Watch GT wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Nothing CMF Watch Pro 2
Nothing · 2024CMF Watch Pro 2
5.5Score
2 advantages≈ $65
vs
Vivo iQOO Watch GT
Vivo · 2024iQOO Watch GT
6.7Score
7 advantages≈ $65
Higher score
5.2Display8.7
5.0Health tracking5.0
3.9Smart features9.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

CMF Watch Pro 2iQOO Watch GT
45 × 4513.639.6 × 45.811.2
CMF Watch Pro 2iQOO Watch GTDifference
Height45 mm45.8 mm−0.8 mm
Width45 mm39.6 mm+5.4 mm
Thickness13.6 mm11.2 mm+2.4 mm
Weight44 g33 g+11 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is CMF Watch Pro 2 better than iQOO Watch GT?

  1. Resolution (width)466 px vs 390 px+19%
  2. Pixel density353 ppi vs 322 ppi+10%

Why is iQOO Watch GT better than CMF Watch Pro 2?

  1. NFC paymentsNo · CMF Watch Pro 2: Yes
  2. LTE (cellular)No · CMF Watch Pro 2: Yes
  3. Screen size1.32″ vs 1.85″+40%
  4. Weight44.4 g vs 33 g+35%
  5. eSIMNo · CMF Watch Pro 2: Yes
  6. Battery capacity305 mAh vs 505 mAh+66%
  7. Thickness13.6 mm vs 11.2 mm+21%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare